Sample Type and Storage Conditions Affect Calprotectin Measurements in Blood

21Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Calprotectin, a complex of calcium-binding proteins, is abundant in granulocytes. Increased levels of plasma calprotectin have been found in patients with inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. However, a number of preanalytical factors may affect calprotectin measurement in blood samples. Methods: Twelve blood samples [4 tubes, 1 each of lithium-heparin (Li-heparin), EDTA, and serum] were drawn from each of 14 healthy individuals. To evaluate the effect of temperature and storage time in the lag time between collection and centrifugation, samples were kept for 2 h at 4 °C, 20 °C, or 37 °C, before centrifugation. Leukocyte, neutrophil, and monocyte counts were measured in EDTA samples on a Sysmex XN-10 hematology analyzer to investigate the relationship between calprotectin concentrations and the granulocyte count. Results: Calprotectin measurements in EDTA samples were not influenced by temperature or time lag between collection and analysis. Compared to EDTA plasma, significantly higher calprotectin concentrations were found in serum and Li-heparin plasma samples. Furthermore, calprotectin concentrations increased in serum and Li-heparin samples when stored at higher temperatures. There was a linear relationship between the serum calprotectin concentration and neutrophil count in EDTA whole blood. Conclusions: EDTA is the most suitable anticoagulant for determination of calprotectin in plasma, as this sample matrix does not seem to be affected by temperature or time between sample collection and analysis. Of particular note, neutrophil activation by either clotting or centrifugation should be avoided during the preanalytical process.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pedersen, L., Birkemose, E., Gils, C., Safi, S., & Nybo, M. (2018). Sample Type and Storage Conditions Affect Calprotectin Measurements in Blood. Journal of Applied Laboratory Medicine, 2(6), 851–856. https://doi.org/10.1373/jalm.2017.024778

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free