Abstract
There appears to be a general movement away from universal child benefits and towards means-testing. In the present article we argue that instead of suppressing the labour supply of middle-income parents by withdrawing the transfer as a function of income, one should consider the alternative of financing a generous universal child benefit by increasing taxation of income. The implications of means-testing compared with a tax-financed universal alternative are discussed analytically in a piecewise linear schedule and by combining information from behavioural and non-behavioural micro-simulation models. Our results provide support for making child benefit universal instead of means-tested.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Rees, R., Thoresen, T. O., & Vattø, T. E. (2023). Alternatives to Paying Child Benefit to the Rich: Means-Testing or Higher Tax? Australian Economic Review, 56(3), 328–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8462.12511
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.