Alternatives to Paying Child Benefit to the Rich: Means-Testing or Higher Tax?

2Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

There appears to be a general movement away from universal child benefits and towards means-testing. In the present article we argue that instead of suppressing the labour supply of middle-income parents by withdrawing the transfer as a function of income, one should consider the alternative of financing a generous universal child benefit by increasing taxation of income. The implications of means-testing compared with a tax-financed universal alternative are discussed analytically in a piecewise linear schedule and by combining information from behavioural and non-behavioural micro-simulation models. Our results provide support for making child benefit universal instead of means-tested.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rees, R., Thoresen, T. O., & Vattø, T. E. (2023). Alternatives to Paying Child Benefit to the Rich: Means-Testing or Higher Tax? Australian Economic Review, 56(3), 328–354. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8462.12511

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free