Self-determination: What can we learn from persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities?

32Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Self-determination is often equated with independence and individual choices, which limits its relevance for persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) due to their dependency. This paper challenges the notion of independence by arguing for a rethinking of self-determination that is sensitive to lives characterised by dependency and non-verbal being. An ethnographic study informed by phenomenology emphasising embodiment shed light on how self-determination can unfold in the lives of persons with PIMD in relationships with professionals. These data are engaged in a theoretical discussion, dialoguing with theories of self-determination and ethics of care. We advocate that a rethinking involving embodied communication, partnership and ongoing processes of being understood can offer a sound way of grasping the phenomenon of self-determination, both for persons with and without PIMD.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Skarsaune, S. N., Hanisch, H., & Gjermestad, A. (2021). Self-determination: What can we learn from persons with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities? Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 23(1), 317–327. https://doi.org/10.16993/SJDR.830

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free