Abstract
Using fresh clinical material, a comparison of a number of anaerobic selective media was made. For Gram-negative anaerobes nalidixic acid tween agar (NAT), neomycin agar (NA), and neomycin-vancomycin agar (NVA) all performed equally well. Kanamycin-containing media were more inhibitory to all Gram-negative anaerobes other than Bacteroides fragilis and B. melaninogenicus. When the recovery of Gram-positive anaerobes was examined NAT performed better than any of the other selective media used. No single selective medium could recover all anaerobes. Better isolation was achieved using a combination of two selective media (the best combinations being NAT and NVA or NAT and NA). Only a combination of three selective media gave the maximum recovery of anaerobes in this study (NAT, NVA, and NA or KA).
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Wren, M. W. D. (1980). Multiple selective media for the isolation of anaerobic bacteria from clinical specimens. Journal of Clinical Pathology, 33(1), 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1136/jcp.33.1.61
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.