Entamoeba Species in South Africa: Correlations with the Host Microbiome, Parasite Burdens, and First Description of Entamoeba bangladeshi Outside of Asia

50Citations
Citations of this article
93Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background. Diarrhea is frequent in communities without clean water, which include low-income South African populations in Giyani and Pretoria. In these populations, the amount of diarrhea caused by Entamoeba histolytica, inclusive of all ages, sexes, and human immunodeficiency virus status, is uncertain. Infection with E. histolytica can modulate the host microbiota, and a key species indicative of this is the Prevotella copri pathobiont. Methods. A cross-sectional study of patients attending gastroenterology clinics was conducted to determine the frequency and burden of 4 Entamoeba species and P. copri. Results. Entamoeba species were present in 27% of patients (129/484), with E. histolytica detected in 8.5% (41), E. dispar in 8% (38), E. bangladeshi in 4.75% (23), and E. moshkovskii in 0%. This is the first description of E. bangladeshi outside Bangladesh. In E. histolytica-positive samples, the levels of both the parasite and P. copri were lower in nondiarrheal samples, validating the results of a study in Bangladesh (P = .0034). By contrast, in E. histolytica-negative samples positive for either of the nonpathogenic species E. dispar or E. bangladeshi, neither P. copri nor Entamoeba levels were linked to gastrointestinal status. Conclusions. Nonmorphologic identification of this parasite is essential. In South Africa, 3 morphologically identical Entamoeba were common, but only E. histolytica was linked to both disease and changes in the microbiota.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ngobeni, R., Samie, A., Moonah, S., Watanabe, K., Petri, W. A., & Gilchrist, C. (2017). Entamoeba Species in South Africa: Correlations with the Host Microbiome, Parasite Burdens, and First Description of Entamoeba bangladeshi Outside of Asia. In Journal of Infectious Diseases (Vol. 216, pp. 1592–1600). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jix535

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free