Determining the Degree of Perceptible Static Eyelid Asymmetry and Effect of Face Inversion: A Cross-sectional Pilot Study

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: To determine the degree of static eyelid asymmetry required to be perceptible and whether this is affected by image inversion. Methods: Images of 3 volunteers were digitally manipulated to have eyelid asymmetry of 0.5 mm, 1 mm, or 1.5 mm of 3 different types, upper lid ptosis, upper lid retraction, and lower lid retraction. Forty-nine laypersons stated whether the images were symmetrical or asymmetrical. A separate inversion survey, completed by 29 clinicians, consisted of symmetrical images and 1 mm asymmetrical images, with half being inverted. Results: Upper lid ptosis, upper lid retraction, and lower lid retraction were not detected by most laypeople at 0.5 mm of severity (18.9%, 6.7%, 18.9% detection, respectively) but all 3 were detected by the majority of participants once asymmetry reached 1 mm severity (65.7%, 61.8%, 51.0% detection, respectively) and rose to over 70% identification at 1.5 mm (92.2%, 73.5%, 73.5% detection, respectively). Inversion of the images led to 19.7% lower rates of correct identification of asymmetrical faces compared with images presented in the correct orientation (80.7% asymmetry identified in normal images, 61.0% inverted, p < 0.001). Conclusions: All asymmetries were detectable by a majority of laypersons at a severity of 1 mm. Image inversion decreases a clinician's ability to detect a 1 mm asymmetry, indicating an impaired asymmetry perception in the intraoperative view. This study provides research to counsel patients with varying degrees of eyelid asymmetry.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Preston, F. G., Sultan, Z., Hsuan, J., Hamill, K. J., & McCormick, A. G. (2024). Determining the Degree of Perceptible Static Eyelid Asymmetry and Effect of Face Inversion: A Cross-sectional Pilot Study. Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 40(5), 560–564. https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0000000000002650

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free