Development and validation of a prediction rule for benefit and harm of Dual antiplatelet therapy beyond 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention

861Citations
Citations of this article
550Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Dual antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) reduces ischemia but increases bleeding. OBJECTIVE To develop a clinical decision tool to identify patients expected to derive benefit vs harm from continuing thienopyridine beyond 1 year after PCI. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Among 11 648 randomized DAPT Study patients from 11 countries (August 2009-May 2014), a prediction rule was derived stratifying patients into groups to distinguish ischemic and bleeding risk 12 to 30 months after PCI. Validation was internal via bootstrap resampling and external among 8136 patients from 36 countries randomized in the PROTECT trial (June 2007-July 2014). EXPOSURES: Twelve months of open-label thienopyridine plus aspirin, then randomized to 18 months of continued thienopyridine plus aspirin vs placebo plus aspirin. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Ischemia (myocardial infarction or stent thrombosis) and bleeding (moderate or severe) 12 to 30 months after PCI. RESULTS: Among DAPT Study patients (derivation cohort; mean age, 61.3 years;women, 25.1%), ischemia occurred in 348 patients (3.0%) and bleeding in 215 (1.8%). Derivation cohort models predicting ischemia and bleeding had c statistics of 0.70 and 0.68, respectively. The prediction rule assigned 1 point each formyocardial infarction at presentation, priormyocardial infarction or PCI, diabetes, stent diameter less than 3 mm, smoking, and paclitaxel-eluting stent; 2 points each for history of congestive heart failure/lowejection fraction and vein graft intervention; -1 point for age 65 to younger than 75 years; and -2 points for age 75 years or older. Among the high score group (score>2, n = 5917), continued thienopyridine vs placebo was associated with reduced ischemic events (2.7%vs 5.7%; risk difference [RD], -3.0%[95% CI, -4.1%to -2.0%], P <2, n = 5731;1.7%vs 2.3%; RD, -0.7%[95%CI, -1.4%to 0.09%], P =.07; interaction P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yeh, R. W., Secemsky, E. A., Kereiakes, D. J., Normand, S. L. T., Gershlick, A. H., Cohen, D. J., … Mauri, L. (2016). Development and validation of a prediction rule for benefit and harm of Dual antiplatelet therapy beyond 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association, 315(16), 1735–1749. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.3775

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free