Información sobre el riesgo cardiovascular a hipertensos seguidos en atención primaria. ¿Mejora nuestra eficacia?

5Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives. To analyse how information to patients on their cardiovascular risk affects the latter's subsequent evolution and to see whether there are differences in the evolution of risk as a function of its being high, moderate, or low. Design. Intervention study of patients who attended our scheduled hypertension clinics. Setting. Health centre on the periphery of Murcia, Spain. Participants. Three hundred patients (139 men and 161 women) from 40 to 75 years old, with essential hypertension, treated or otherwise, controlled or otherwise, in the hypertension programme. They were divided into 3 groups of 100 patients: low, moderate, and high risk. Interventions. There were 2 attendances of each patient: a) initially, at which cardiovascular risk was calculated; half of each risk group were informed of their cardiovascular risk; b) finally, a year later, at which the cardiovascular risk of all the patients was calculated. Main measurements. Calculation of cardiovascular risk on the Framingham scale. Results. No significant differences were appreciated in low and moderate cardiovascular risk groups. In the high-risk group, the informed patients fell from an initial 23.6±2.5% to 20.1±2.6% after a year (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Leal Hernández, M., Abellán Alemán, J., Ríos Cano, E. J., Martínez Crespo, J., Sebastián Vicente, B., & Martínez, R. V. (2006). Información sobre el riesgo cardiovascular a hipertensos seguidos en atención primaria. ¿Mejora nuestra eficacia? Atencion Primaria, 38(2), 102–106. https://doi.org/10.1157/13090433

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free