Leveraging Argumentation Knowledge Graph for Interactive Argument Pair Identification

Abstract

Interactive argument pair identification is essential in the context of dialogical argumentation mining. Existing research treats it as a problem of sentence matching and largely relies on textual information to compute the similarities. However, the interaction of opinions usually involves the background of the topic and requires reasoning of knowledge, which is beyond textual information. In this paper, we propose to leverage external knowledge to enhance the identification of interactive argument pairs. We construct the argumentation knowledge graph from the discussion thread of the target topic in the online forum. The interaction between the original argument and the reply is then represented as the path of concepts in the knowledge graph. In practice, we utilize Graph Convolutional Network (GCN) to learn the concept representation in the knowledge graph and use a Transformer-based encoder to learn the representation of paths. Finally, an information alignment network is employed to capture the interaction of textual information of conceptual information (both entity-level and path-level). Experiment results indicate that our model achieves state-of-the-art performance in the benchmark dataset. Further analysis demonstrates the effectiveness of our model for enforcing knowledge reasoning through paths in the knowledge graph.