Tawaran Model KKR Indonesia Dalam Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Ham Berat Masa Lalu Dengan Sejumlah Pengalaman Pembanding

  • Prabowo R
  • Mulya K
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

: How a nation contront it’s past is one of the topics on studies of transititonal justice. Since Constitutional Court nullified Indonesian TRC Law 27/2004, reconciliation in Indonesia has entered a status quo. This paper explores possibilities on regulating the future of Indonesian reconciliation law based on three points of departures: (i) the dynamics on regulating reconciliation in Indonesia, (ii) precedents from Constitutional Court’s decisions, and (iii) lesson learned from South Africa and Chile’s TRCs. Using normative legal approach, this paper proposes four reconciliation models: (i) legal policy with amnesy, (ii) legal policy without amnesty, (iii) political policy, and (iv) an alternative model with the formation of Reparation Commission. This paper concludes the last offered model as the least resort for fulfilling victims’ rights on reparation while anticipating future legal/political policy on reconciliation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Prabowo, R. A., & Mulya, K. B. (2022). Tawaran Model KKR Indonesia Dalam Penyelesaian Pelanggaran Ham Berat Masa Lalu Dengan Sejumlah Pengalaman Pembanding. JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN KEKUASAAN, 2(1), 54–83. https://doi.org/10.24167/jhpk.v2i1.5648

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free