Learning from accident and error: Avoiding the hazards of workload, stress, and routine interruptions in the emergency department

30Citations
Citations of this article
128Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article presents a model of how a build-up of interruptions can shift the dynamics of the emergency department (ED) from an adaptive, self-regulating system into a fragile, crisis-prone one. Drawing on case studies of organizational disasters and insights from the theory of high-reliability organizations, the authors use computer simulations to show how the accumulation of small interruptions could have disproportionately large effects in the ED. In the face of a mounting workload created by interruptions, EDs, like other organizational systems, have tipping points, thresholds beyond which a vicious cycle can lead rather quickly to the collapse of normal operating routines and in the extreme to a crisis of organizational paralysis. The authors discuss some possible implications for emergency medicine, emphasizing the potential threat from routine, non-novel demands on EDs and raising the concern that EDs are operating closer to the precipitous edge of crisis as ED crowding exacerbates the problem. © 2011 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bradley Morrison, J., & Rudolph, J. W. (2011). Learning from accident and error: Avoiding the hazards of workload, stress, and routine interruptions in the emergency department. Academic Emergency Medicine, 18(12), 1246–1254. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2011.01231.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free