Thoracic endovascular aortic repair as emergency therapy despite suspected aortic infection

14Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) as emergency therapy despite suspected aortic infection. METHODS: Within a 5-year period, we treated 6 patients with a strategy of primary TEVAR despite suspected aortic infection in patients with symptomatic or already ruptured thoracic aortic pathology. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 16.7. The reason for death was septic multiorgan failure. During follow-up, 2 patients were converted to secondary open surgery in a stable elective setting. The median follow-up was 42.5 months. All surviving patients are not receiving continuing antibiotic therapy. Freedom from infection is 100 to date. CONCLUSIONS: TEVAR as emergency therapy despite suspected aortic infection is feasible and may well serve as a definite treatment option in selected cases. As recurring infection cannot be entirely excluded, life-long clinical and morphological surveillance remains mandatory. © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stellmes, A., Von Allmen, R., Derungs, U., Dick, F., Makaloski, V., Do, D. D., … Czerny, M. (2013). Thoracic endovascular aortic repair as emergency therapy despite suspected aortic infection. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 16(4), 459–464. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivs539

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free