Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) as emergency therapy despite suspected aortic infection. METHODS: Within a 5-year period, we treated 6 patients with a strategy of primary TEVAR despite suspected aortic infection in patients with symptomatic or already ruptured thoracic aortic pathology. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 16.7. The reason for death was septic multiorgan failure. During follow-up, 2 patients were converted to secondary open surgery in a stable elective setting. The median follow-up was 42.5 months. All surviving patients are not receiving continuing antibiotic therapy. Freedom from infection is 100 to date. CONCLUSIONS: TEVAR as emergency therapy despite suspected aortic infection is feasible and may well serve as a definite treatment option in selected cases. As recurring infection cannot be entirely excluded, life-long clinical and morphological surveillance remains mandatory. © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Stellmes, A., Von Allmen, R., Derungs, U., Dick, F., Makaloski, V., Do, D. D., … Czerny, M. (2013). Thoracic endovascular aortic repair as emergency therapy despite suspected aortic infection. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, 16(4), 459–464. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivs539
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.