The governance & behavioral challenges of generative artificial intelligence’s hypercustomization capabilities

7Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is changing human–machine interactions and the broader information ecosystem. Much as social media algorithms personalize online experiences, GenAI applications can align with user preferences to customize the way individuals interact with information. However, through training, fine-tuning, and prompting, GenAI applications can introduce a new level of customization: hypercustomization. By dynamically tailoring responses to an individual’s explicit and implicit preferences, hypercustomization can reinforce biases, false beliefs, or misconceptions. As a result, it can heighten significant societal challenges, such as the spread of misinformation and political and social polarization. In this article, we explore the risks associated with hypercustomization and the governance and behavioral challenges that might impede effective risk mitigation. These challenges include a lack of transparency in GenAI applications, opacity of the nature of their interactions with users, users’ overreliance on these systems, and the inefficacy of warning messages. We also provide recommendations for overcoming these challenges.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abels, C. M., Lopez-Lopez, E., Burton, J. W., Holford, D. L., Brinkmann, L., Herzog, S. M., & Lewandowsky, S. (2025). The governance & behavioral challenges of generative artificial intelligence’s hypercustomization capabilities. Behavioral Science and Policy, 11(1), 22–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/23794607251347020

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free