The effects of mandatory health insurance on equity in access to outpatient care in Indonesia

86Citations
Citations of this article
252Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper examines the effects of mandatory health insurance on access and equity in access to public and private outpatient care in Indonesia. Data from the second round of the 1997 Indonesian Family Life Survey were used. We adopted the concentration index as a measure of equity, and this was calculated from actual data and from predicted probability of outpatient-care use saved from a multinomial logit regression. The study found that a mandatory insurance scheme for civil servants (Askes) had a strongly positive impact on access to public outpatient care, while a mandatory insurance scheme for private employees (Jamsostek) had a positive impact on access to both public and private outpatient care. The greatest effects of Jamsostek were observed amongst poor beneficiaries. A substantial increase in access will be gained by expanding insurance to the whole population. However, neither Askes nor Jamsostek had a positive impact on equity. Policy implications are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hidayat, B., Thabrany, H., Dong, H., & Sauerborn, R. (2004, September). The effects of mandatory health insurance on equity in access to outpatient care in Indonesia. Health Policy and Planning. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czh037

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free