CLINICAL AND IMMUNOLOGICAL PROFILE OF NEWLY DIAGNOSED DIABETIC PATIENTS IN A COHORT OF YOUNG ADULTS OF NATIONAL HEPATITIS C VIRUS SURVEY IN EGYPT

1Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: T2DM (Type 2 diabetes mellitus) is considered a disease that affects old age group. Recently, it has become common in children, adolescents and adults. Aim of the work: To highlight the challenges in differentiating T1DM (type1 diabetes mellitus) from T2DM (type2 diabetes mellitus) in early onset diabetes in youth depending on clinical and laboratory characteristics. Methodology: Our cross-sectional study was performed on 200 newly diagnosed diabetic patients aged (18-30) years. All patients were subjected to detailed medical history and full clinical examination. Laboratory investigations included FBS, 2hPP, HbA1C, fasting C peptide and GADA. Results: About 59% (118) of our patients were T2DM while (82) 41% were T1DM. T1DM was more dominant than T2DM in age group less than 25 years (T1DM 79% versus T2DM 21%, P < 0.001), while T2DM was more than T1DM in age group more than 25 years (T2DM 93% versus T1DM 17%, P < 0.001). GADA was detected in 73.2 % of T1DM patient and it was high titer while GADA was detected in only 8% of T2DM with low titer, in addition GADA positive patients were significantly younger than negative patients, age (20.9 ± 2.5 years vs. 26.4 ± 3.5 years respectively) (P <0.001). Conclusion: About 8% of phenotypically type 2 diabetic youth had GADA positive antibodies which did not confer impact on c peptide level or glycemic control yet type 1 diabetics who were GADA negative had a better glycemic control.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Halawa, M. R., Elhefnawy, M. H., Eid, Y. M., Elhalawany, S. H., Hegab, A. M., & Hendawy, L. M. (2022). CLINICAL AND IMMUNOLOGICAL PROFILE OF NEWLY DIAGNOSED DIABETIC PATIENTS IN A COHORT OF YOUNG ADULTS OF NATIONAL HEPATITIS C VIRUS SURVEY IN EGYPT. Georgian Medical News, 333(12), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.21608/esdlj.2022.455705

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free