A randomized phase III study of napabucasin [BBI608] (NAPA) vs placebo (PBO) in patients (pts) with pretreated advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC): the CCTG/AGITG CO.23 trial

  • Jonker D
  • Nott L
  • Yoshino T
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

282 pts were randomized (138 NAPA, 144 PBO) from 04/2013 - 05/2014 when the trial was unblinded, accrual closed, and protocol treatment stopped after the futility analysis. Pts were median age = 64 (32 to 85); male = 65%; ECOG 0:1 (%) =28:72; >4 prior regimens = 98%; prior anti-VEGF = 89%; KRAS WT = 52%. No significant difference was observed in OS, progression free survival (PFS) or DCR between NAPA and PBO in the ITT analysis. AE more frequent with NAPA included: any grade diarrhea (88 vs 32%), nausea (63 vs 47%), and anorexia (56 vs 46%), all p \r\r

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jonker, D. J., Nott, L., Yoshino, T., Gill, S., Shapiro, J., Ohtsu, A., … O’Callaghan, C. J. (2016). A randomized phase III study of napabucasin [BBI608] (NAPA) vs placebo (PBO) in patients (pts) with pretreated advanced colorectal cancer (ACRC): the CCTG/AGITG CO.23 trial. Annals of Oncology, 27, vi150. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw370.03

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free