XMM‐Newton and Chandra Observations of the Galaxy Group NGC 5044. I. Evidence for Limited Multiphase Hot Gas

  • Buote D
  • Lewis A
  • Brighenti F
  • et al.
75Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Using new XMM and Chandra observations we present an analysis of the temperature structure of the hot gas within a radius of 100 kpc of the bright nearby galaxy group NGC 5044. A spectral deprojection analysis of data extracted from circular annuli reveals that a two-temperature model (2T) of the hot gas is favored over single-phase or cooling flow (M_dot = 4.5 +/- 0.2 M_{sun}/yr) models within the central ~30 kpc. Alternatively, the data can be fit equally well if the temperature within each spherical shell varies continuously from ~T_h to T_c ~ T_h/2, but no lower. The high spatial resolution of the Chandra data allows us to determine that the temperature excursion T_h --> T_c required in each shell exceeds the temperature range between the boundaries of the same shell in the best-fitting single-phase model. This is strong evidence for a multi-phase gas having a limited temperature range. The cooler component of the 2T model has a temperature (T_c \~ 0.7 keV) similar to the kinetic temperature of the stars. The hot phase has a temperature (T_h ~ 1.4 keV) characteristic of the virial temperature of the \~10^{13} M_{sun} halo expected in the NGC 5044 group. However, in view of the morphological disturbances and X-ray holes visible in the Chandra image within R ~10 kpc, bubbles of gas heated to ~T_h in this region may be formed by intermittent AGN feedback. Some additional heating at larger radii may be associated with the evolution of the cold front near R ~50 kpc, as suggested by the sharp edge in the EPIC images.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Buote, D. A., Lewis, A. D., Brighenti, F., & Mathews, W. G. (2003). XMM‐Newton and Chandra Observations of the Galaxy Group NGC 5044. I. Evidence for Limited Multiphase Hot Gas. The Astrophysical Journal, 594(2), 741–757. https://doi.org/10.1086/377094

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free