Tetanic stimulus of ulnar nerve as a predictor of heart rate response to skin incision in propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia

45Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background. To study adequate antinociception during general anaesthesia, tetanic stimulus of 5-10 s duration has been used previously as a standardized nociceptive stimulus. However, such stimuli have been found to correlate poorly with intraoperative nociception. We hypothesized that an electrical tetanic stimulus of the ulnar nerve, lasting 30 s, would provide a reliable experimental pain model. Methods. Thirty-three patients, undergoing open abdominal surgery, were studied. Propofol and remifentanil were used for anaesthesia. Patients were randomized to receive remifentanil at three target-controlled infusion levels (1, 3, or 5 ng ml-1) during short (5 s, Tet5) and a long-lasting (30 s, Tet30) tetanic (50 mA, 50 Hz) stimulus and skin incision. RR intervals (RRI) were obtained from the ECG and the mean RRI before each stimulus (Tet5, Tet30, incision) was compared with that after the stimulus. Results. At remifentanil level 1 ng ml-1, the RRI responses to tetanic stimuli and skin incision were prominent but with higher concentrations (3 and 5 mg ml-1), responses were very small. Tet30 (r2=0.780) was the best predictor of the RRI response to skin incision when compared with Tet5 (r2=0.611), remifentanil level (r2=0.340), or propofol level (r2=0.036). Conclusions. Long-lasting tetanic stimulus of ulnar nerve may provide a better experimental pain model for surgical pain during general anaesthesia than shorter stimuli, which have been applied in earlier studies. © The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia 2007. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rantanen, M., Yppärilä-Wolters, H., van Gils, M., Yli-Hankala, A., Huiku, M., Kymäläinen, M., & Korhonen, I. (2007). Tetanic stimulus of ulnar nerve as a predictor of heart rate response to skin incision in propofol-remifentanil anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 99(4), 509–513. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aem200

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free