Processing Optimization of Sustainable AA6061–Fly Ash Composites by Compocasting

3Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Fly ash is an abundant industrial byproduct with potential as a particulate reinforcement in aluminum matrices, yet conventional stir casting often yields poor dispersion and weak interfaces. AA6061/fly ash composites containing 4–12 wt.% reinforcement were fabricated by compocasting (semisolid) and followed by material characterizations: XRD, SEM, fractography, hardness testing, and tensile testing. Reproducibility was assessed by analysis of variance (ANOVA), and performance was benchmarked against stir-cast counterparts. XRD detected no interfacial reaction products. SEM revealed a uniform dispersion of 20–50 μm particles, pore-free interfaces, and grain refinement, attributed to Zener pinning and heterogeneous nucleation. The microhardness doubled from 55 HV (unreinforced AA6061) to 110 HV (fly ash 12 wt.%), while the ultimate tensile strength increased from 140 to 249 MPa (+78%). Ductility decreased from 14% to 5%, consistent with the trade-offs associated with ceramic-particle toughening. Fractography revealed mixed-mode fracture surfaces with both intact and fractured particles, indicating robust interfacial bonding. ANOVA supported measurement reproducibility (p < 0.001). Relative to stir casting, compocasting yielded more uniform dispersion, lower porosity, and cleaner interfaces. Compocasting enables AA6061/fly ash composites with refined microstructures and substantially enhanced strength and hardness at the expense of reduced ductility. The process offers a practical route to valorize fly ash as reinforcement for weight-critical applications (automotive/aerospace) without deleterious interfacial reactions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barah, O. O., Bori, I., Otaru, A. J., & Zaid, Z. A. A. A. (2026). Processing Optimization of Sustainable AA6061–Fly Ash Composites by Compocasting. ACS Omega, 11(4), 6647–6656. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.5c11742

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free