Evaluation of swallowing in transverse maxillary deficiency patients before and after rapid maxillary expansion

5Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate swallowing function in relation to oropharyngeal dysphagia (OD) in adolescents who had transverse maxillary deficiency with posterior crossbite and high-Arched palate, before, and after rapid maxillary expansion (RME). Materials and Methods: Twenty patients (mean age: 13.0 ± 3.1) with bilateral posterior crossbite and high-Arched palate (RME group: RMEG) and 20 volunteers (mean age: 13.4 ±.6) with Class I crowding without posterior crossbite or high-Arched palate (control group: CG) were recruited. OD signs and symptoms were evaluated using the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (EAT-10) questionnaire, patient complaints, and physical examination of swallowing function before (T1) and 7 months after (T2) RME. Additionally, fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) with water, yogurt, and cracker was performed. In CG, evaluation of swallowing was performed only once, corresponding to T1 of RMEG. Results: Prevalence of OD signs and symptoms based on patient complaints and physical examination of swallowing was low (5%-15%), and nonsignificant differences were observed between CG and RMEG at T1 for these parameters as well as for EAT-10 scores. Total postswallow pharyngeal residue with yogurt was significantly different between CG and RMEG at T1, with a prevalence of 60% in RMEG (P.05). Conclusion: Patients with a maxillary transverse deficiency were affected by pharyngeal residue as indicated by FEES, but it did not appear to improve in short-Term follow-up in patients treated with RME. (Angle Orthod. 2023;93:552-557.)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yalcin, A., Aras, I., Gode, S., Durusoy, D., Sezgin, B., Eyigor, S., & Aras, A. (2023). Evaluation of swallowing in transverse maxillary deficiency patients before and after rapid maxillary expansion. Angle Orthodontist, 93(5), 552–557. https://doi.org/10.2319/101222-703.1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free