Dis/organising visibilities: Governmentalisation and counter-transparency

16Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper situates organisational transparency in an agonistic space that is shaped by the interplay of ‘mechanisms of power that adhere to a truth’ and critical practices that come from below in a movement of ‘not being governed like that and at that cost’ (Foucault, 2003: 265). This positioning involves an understanding of transparency as a practice that is historically contingent and multiple, and thus negotiable and contested. By illustrating the entanglement of ‘power through transparency’ and ‘counter-transparency’ with reference to the example of Edward Snowden’s whistleblowing, the paper contributes to the critique of transparency and to debates on the use of Foucauldian concepts in post-panoptic contexts of organising. By introducing the notion of ‘counter-transparency’, the paper expands the conceptual vocabulary for understanding the politics and ethics of managing and organising visibility.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Weiskopf, R. (2023). Dis/organising visibilities: Governmentalisation and counter-transparency. Organization, 30(2), 326–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508421995751

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free