Identification of risk factors for delayed onset of lactation

241Citations
Citations of this article
172Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To identify infant feeding, socioeseconomic, demographic, and delivery-related factors that affect women's self-reported timing of the onset of lactation. Design: Longitudinal survey of women from day 1 postpartum until self-reported onset of lactation. Subjects were interviewed in person on day 1 postpartum, then surveyed daily by telephone regarding infant feeding method, breast symptoms, and perception of whether the onset of lactation had occurred. Medical records were reviewed. Subjects/setting: Data were collected from 192 women after they gave birth to a healthy, term singleton. Statistical analyses performed: χ2 Analyses were used to identify variables associated with delayed onset of lactation (onset of lactation ≥72 hours postpartum). Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the independent association of each significant variable with delayed onset of lactation. Results: Risk factors for delayed onset of lactation included white/Hispanic ethnicity, heavy/obese body build, delivery of offspring by unscheduled cesarean delivery, vaginal delivery with prolonged Stage 2 labor, infant birth weight less than 8 lb, and exclusive formula-feeding before the onset of lactation. Applications/conclusions: Women who are at risk for delayed onset of lactation need additional breast- feeding support during the first week postpartum. During their hospitalization, these women should be instructed about the normal lactation process and the possibility that onset of lactation may occur later than 72 hours postpartum. Frequent nursing should be recommended, as delayed onset of lactation was associated with the lack of infant suckling.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chapman, D. J., & Pérez-Escamilla, R. (1999). Identification of risk factors for delayed onset of lactation. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 99(4), 450–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8223(99)00109-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free