Sedation for vitreoretinal surgery: A comparison of anaesthetist-administered midazolam and patient-controlled sedation with propofol

19Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Local anaesthesia is increasingly being used for vitreoretinal surgery, but the optimal technique for sedation remains unclear. Anaesthetist-administered midazolam, which is often used, was compared in this study to patient-controlled sedation with propofol in 43 patients undergoing 50 vitreoretinal procedures. A variety of patient, anaesthetist and surgical endpoints were measured. There were no significant outcome differences between the two agents except that midazolam produced more amnesia for the local anaesthetic eye block. However, several outcomes and the observations in patients who experienced both agents showed a trend in favour of propofol for intraoperative sedation. We conclude that both approaches are safe and that patient-controlled sedation with propofol is at least as satisfactory as anaesthetist-administered midazolam.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Morley, H. R., Karagiannis, A., Schultz, D. J., Walker, J. C., & Newland, H. S. (2000). Sedation for vitreoretinal surgery: A comparison of anaesthetist-administered midazolam and patient-controlled sedation with propofol. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, 28(1), 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057x0002800106

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free