Two types of planning in language generation

16Citations
Citations of this article
85Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

As our understanding of natural language generation has increased, a number of tasks have been separated from realization and put together under the heading "text planning". So far, however, no-one has enumerated the kinds of tasks a text planner should be able to do. This paper describes the principal lesson learned in combining a number of planning tasks in a planner-realizer: planning and realization should be interleaved, in a limited-commitment planning paradigm, to perform two types of planning: prescriptive and restrictive. Limited-commitment planning consists of both prescriptive (hierarchical expansion) planning and of restrictive planning (selecting from options with reference to the status of active goals). At present, existing text planners use prescriptive plans exclusively. However, a large class of planner tasks, especially those concerned with the pragmatic (non-literal) content of text such as style and slant, is most easily performed under restrictive planning. The kinds of tasks suited to each planning style are listed, and a program that uses both styles is described.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hovy, E. H. (1988). Two types of planning in language generation. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Vol. 1988-June, pp. 179–186). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.3115/982023.982045

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free