Abstract
The process of discovery for 18 important adverse drug reactions was analysed in terms of study designs and other features which determined whether published reports of suspected adverse reactions were convincing or provided valid evidence of causality. First alerts were almost always anecdotal reports. For earlier alerting during clinical trials event recording is needed, associated with dose-reponse data and the use of patients as their own controls.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Venning, G. R. (1983). Identification of adverse reactions to new drugs. III: Alerting processes and early warning systems. British Medical Journal, 286(6363), 458–460. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.286.6363.458
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.