Traditional Panel Interview versus Multiple Mini-Interview (MMI) in Medical School Admissions: Does Performance differ by Age, Gender, Urban or Rural, or Socioeconomic Status (Findings from one medical school)

Abstract

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Introduction:Globally, medical schools are trying to widen access and to increase the diversity of their student body to be more representative of the population and to meet the future heath care needs of society. Selection methods must not disadvantage the applicants from priority groups. In Memorial University’s Faculty of Medicine, rural applicants and applicants from low socioeconomic status are priority groups. Methods:Since 2013, Memorial University has used a combination of traditional panel interviews and MMIs to interview candidates for medical school. We wondered whether applicants who participate in this medical school interview process perform differently on the MMIs compared to the traditional panel interview process and whether performance differs on either of the two interview processes based on age, sex, origin(urban or rural), or socioeconomic status.Results:The mean score on the traditional panel interview was higher than that on the MMI. Females scored higher than males on both the traditional panel interview and the MMI.  Applicants aged 22 and younger performed worse on both the traditional panel interview and the MMI than the other age groups. Neighborhood socioeconomic status, and urban/rural living status were not significantly related with applicants’ performance on the traditional panel interview or MMI.Discussion:The type of interview is not disadvantaging applicants from Memorial University’s priority areas.