Vasodilator therapy in acute myocardial infarction. A comparison of sodium nitroprusside and nitroglycerin

144Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Twenty six patients with complicated acute myocardial infarction were nitroprusside (NP) and nitroglycerin in order to compare the hemodynamic effects of sodium nitropursside (GTN). All patients received NP and 18 of the 26 also received GTN to evaluate both drugs in the same individuals. Both agents produced significant declines in mean arterial pressure, total peripheral resistance (TPR), and heart rate systolic blood pressure product. However, in the 18 patients who received both drugs GTN produced a greater fall (P<0.05) in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCW) (25 to 15 mm Hg) than did NP (24 to 17 mm Hg) and a greater increment (PΩ0.01) in TPR/PCW (0.98 to 1.43) than NP (0.98 to 1.16). These data confirm the potent vasodilatory effects of NP and GTN and suggest that NP has a relatively balanced effect on the arterial and venous circulation, and GTN seems to produce more potent venodilatation than arterial dilatation. These observations provide a basis for a more rational choice of vasodilator agents based on initial hemodynamic measurements in complicated acute myocardial infarction.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Armstrong, P. W., Walker, D. C., Burton, J. R., & Parker, J. O. (1975). Vasodilator therapy in acute myocardial infarction. A comparison of sodium nitroprusside and nitroglycerin. Circulation, 52(6), 1118–1122. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.52.6.1118

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free