Dexamethasone and ketamine as adjuvants to bupivacaine for incisional infiltration in pediatric abdominal operations

1Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Duration of analgesia with incisional infiltration using local anesthetics is short. Ketamine and dexamethasone are known for their role as adjuvants to local anesthetics. Objective: The present study compared the effects of ketamine and dexamethasone on the duration of analgesia when combined with bupivacaine for incisional infiltration in pediatric abdominal operations. Methods: A total of 150 children (1-8 years) undergoing open abdominal operations were randomized equally into three groups to receive incisional infiltration with Bupivacaine 0.25% 1 ml/kg (GpB), ketamine 1 mg/kg + bupivacaine (GpK), and dexamethasone 0.2 mg/kg + bupivacaine (GpD). Groups were compared for time for first analgesic dose (primary outcome), number of children requiring rescue analgesia; number of rescue analgesia doses; and FLACC scores (in the first 24 h postoperatively). Results: Time for first analgesic dose was significantly longer with ketamine (7.7 ± 2.41 h) and dexamethasone (7.46 ± 2.77 h) compared to bupivacaine (3.44 ± 1.34 h) (P < 0.001). FLACC scores were significantly lower in the dexamethasone and ketamine groups compared to bupivacaine at 4 h, 6 h, 8 h, 10 h and 12 h postoperatively (P < 0.001). Forty-eight children in the bupivacaine group required rescue analgesia which was significantly higher than the ketamine and dexamethasone groups (36 and 29 children respectively, P < 0.001. Conclusion: Combining either ketamine or dexamethasone with bupivacaine for incisional infiltration prolonged the duration of analgesia after pediatric abdominal operations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shabana, T. S., Ghaly, S. I., & Ibrahim, D. E. D. M. (2024). Dexamethasone and ketamine as adjuvants to bupivacaine for incisional infiltration in pediatric abdominal operations. Revista Chilena de Anestesia, 53(1), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.25237/revchilanestv53n1-10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free