Abstract
Background: Vertebral osteomyelitis is a serious condition that requires prompt diagnosis to avoid delays in proper management. There is no well-defined gold standard for diagnosis. We describe the current diagnostic approach at our institution, with a focus on the yield of image-guided vertebral biopsy. Methods: We performed a single-centre 10-year retrospective case series, including adults with imaging suggestive of vertebral osteomyelitis/discitis, with either positive blood cultures, and/or a vertebral biopsy. We defined positive histopathology as our gold standard for test characteristic evaluation of biopsy cultures. Results: Out of 694 patients identified, 221 met our inclusion criteria, and 173/221 (78.2%) patients underwent a spinal biopsy. Of those patients with biopsies, 113 (65%) had received antibiotics within 2 weeks preceding their evaluation. Six of 43 (13.9%) bone specimens were positive by culture, while 66/152 (43.4%) of disc specimens were culture positive. Forty-seven of 84 (55.9%) histopathology (bone or disc) specimens were diagnostic for osteomyelitis/discitis. The sensitivity of bone and disk culture were 30.0% and 56.0%, respectively, with specificities of 92.8% and 75.0%, respectively. Twenty-Three (13.4%) patients had repeat biopsies, including 10 bone specimens and 14 disc specimens, and 11 (47.8%) specimens had histopathology performed which diagnosed an additional 3/23 patients (13% additional diagnostic yield). Conclusions: Culture of percutaneous biopsy of disc resulted in the highest diagnostic yield. Histopathology added to the diagnostic yield in culture-negative specimens. Histopathologic evaluation of bone had better yield than bone culture. A repeat biopsy can add to the diagnostic yield.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Weihe, R., Taghlabi, K., Lowrance, M., Reeves, A., Jackson, S. R., Burton, D. C., & El Atrouni, W. (2022, March 1). Culture Yield in the Diagnosis of Native Vertebral Osteomyelitis: A Single Tertiary Center Retrospective Case Series with Literature Review. Open Forum Infectious Diseases. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofac026
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.