A Qualitative Exploration of Chief Nursing Officer Perspectives on Maintaining Magnet® Designation

10Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to determine chief nursing officer (CNO) perspectives on how to sustain the infrastructure required for successful American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC) Magnet® redesignation. BACKGROUND American Nurses Credentialing Center Magnet designation is a prestigious achievement reflective of years of dedication, innovation, mentoring, and leadership support. As challenging as the initial attainment of Magnet status can be, sustaining the success and becoming redesignated is considered even more difficult by many CNOs. However, there have been no published reports indicating how to be successful in Magnet redesignation. METHOD A grounded theory qualitative approach was used, and data were collected through telephone interviews with CNOs who had successfully attained at least 1 redesignation. RESULTS Fourteen CNOs participated; data were organized into 6 themes and 15 subthemes describing the critical elements for Magnet redesignation. CONCLUSION Relationships among the 6 themes and subthemes are theorized in the form of a wheel with 6 spokes. When "set in motion,"the wheel gathers momentum and all of the model elements become coalesced into the organizational ethos.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Urden, L. D., Baclig, J. T., & Sanchez, K. (2021). A Qualitative Exploration of Chief Nursing Officer Perspectives on Maintaining Magnet® Designation. Journal of Nursing Administration, 51(10), 513–518. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000001056

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free