Effect of continuous hemofiltration on hemodynamics, lung inflammation and pulmonary edema in a canine model of acute lung injury

69Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: This study examined whether continuous hemofiltration favorably affects cardiopulmonary variables, lung inflammation, and lung fluid balance in a canine model of oleic acid induced acute lung injury. Methods: Eleven pentobarbital-anesthetized dogs were randomly divided into a control (mechanical ventilation, MV) group (n=6) and a MV plus hemofiltration (HF) group (n=5). All animals received an intravenous injection of oleic acid (0.09 ml/kg) to induce acute lung injury. Continuous arterial-venous hemofiltration (blood flow 100 ml/min, ultrafiltration rate at 50-65 ml·kg-1 h-1) was started after establishment of oleic acid induced acute lung injury and continued for 4 h. Hemodynamics, lung mechanics, gas exchange, lung fluid balance, lung histology, and the level of plasma cytokines were assessed. Results: After 240 min of HF treatment there was a significant increase in cardiac output, reduction in pulmonary arterial pressure, and improvement in both oxygenation and lung mechanics. Also, in the HF group the lung wet-to-dry weight ratio was significantly reduced. Histologically, HF reduced edema and inflammatory cell infiltration in the lung. There was also a significantly greater decrease in plasma IL-6 and IL-8 levels in the HF group than in group receiving MV alone. Conclusions: In a canine model of acute lung injury continuous HF improved cardiopulmonary function, reduced pulmonary edema, decreased lung permeability and inflammation, and decreased the plasma concentration of proinflammatory cytokines.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Su, X., Bai, C., Hong, Q., Zhu, D., He, L., Wu, J., … Matthay, M. A. (2003). Effect of continuous hemofiltration on hemodynamics, lung inflammation and pulmonary edema in a canine model of acute lung injury. Intensive Care Medicine, 29(11), 2034–2042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-003-2017-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free