Bureaucratic Quality and the Gap between Implementation Burden and Administrative Capacities

37Citations
Citations of this article
96Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Democratic governments produce more policies than they can effectively implement. Yet, this gap between the number of policies requiring implementation and the administrative capacities available to do so is not the same in all democracies but varies across countries and sectors. We argue that this variation depends on the coupling of the sectoral bureaucracies in charge of policy formulation and those in charge of policy implementation. We consider these patterns of vertical policy-process integration an important feature of bureaucratic quality. The more the policymaking level is involved in policy implementation (top-down integration) and the easier the policy-implementing level finds it to feed its concerns into policymaking (bottom-up integration), the smaller the so-called burden-capacity gap. We demonstrate this effect through an empirical analysis in 21 OECD countries over a period of more than 40 years in the areas of social and environmental policies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fernández-I-Marín, X., Knill, C., Steinbacher, C., & Steinebach, Y. (2024). Bureaucratic Quality and the Gap between Implementation Burden and Administrative Capacities. American Political Science Review, 118(3), 1240–1260. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055423001090

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free