Effectiveness of the chest pain unit at primary level of health care with telecardiology: a quasi-experimental study of interrupted time series

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Introduction: Chest pain units (CPU) decrease morbi-mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Nevertheless, its effectiveness at primary level of health care with telecardiology support is unknown. Objective: To evaluate effectiveness of CPU on times of observation, diagnostic agreement and emergency department re-admission and hospitalizations. Method: Quasi-experimental study of robust interrupted time series, which included 20,412 patients admitted to the emergency department for chest pain, before and after the implementation of a CPU. Changes in slope, level, autocorrelation and, variance between both periods (before-CPU and after-CPU) in outcomes at 30 day follow-up were analyzed. Results: Subjects had a mean age of 44.9 ± 17.6 years-old and 45.8% were men. The overall rate of hospital admission was 9.0%. The slope of emergency re-consultation rates decreased (difference: −1.23; 95% CI: −2.46 to −0.01; p = 0.049), when comparing the two observation periods. Also, the level of proportion of patients admitted without ACS who finally had an inpatient diagnosis of ACS decreased after-CPU implementation (difference: −8.31; 95% CI: −15,52 to −1.11; p = 0.020). Conclusions: The CPU increased patient discharge safely with a reduction of 30-day re-admissions. In addition, an improvement in the ACS diagnostic agreement without affecting the time of observation or the frequency of re-hospitalization for cardiovascular disease was obtained during the follow-up.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alzate-Gutiérrez, N., Roldán-Toro, H., Gallo-Villegas, J., & Aristizábal-Ocampo, D. (2021). Effectiveness of the chest pain unit at primary level of health care with telecardiology: a quasi-experimental study of interrupted time series. Revista Colombiana de Cardiologia, 28(4), 324–333. https://doi.org/10.24875/RCCAR.M21000062

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free