Tying US Defense Spending to GDP: Bad Logic, Bad Policy

  • Sharp T
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Talent suggested that pegging the defense budget to GDP would focus public debate regarding the budget squarelywhere it belonged, on mandatory spending programs, and promote the more efficient use of defense dollars.12 In April 2007, analysts at Heritage wrote that the White House and Congress should commit now to spending four percent of [GDP] on national defense even after any drawdown ofUS forces inAfghanistan or Iraq.47 Suggesting that defense spending should be pegged at four percent of GDP is one thing; finding a way to pay for such a massive commitment against competing needs for mandatory and nondefense discretionary spending is something else entirely.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sharp, T. (2008). Tying US Defense Spending to GDP: Bad Logic, Bad Policy. The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters, 38(3). https://doi.org/10.55540/0031-1723.2443

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free