The Historical Significance of Titicut Follies in Psychiatric Treatment: An Anti-Censorship Perspective

0Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Works of art and information judged as obscene can be censored or banned. This brief review evaluates the costs and benefits of censorship and the banning of artwork and information. In the history of psychology, Frederick Wiseman’s film Titicut Follies epitomizes the disadvantages of concealing art content. Despite protecting the privacy of patients, the ban of Titicut Follies delayed the reform of psychiatric treatment practices and hospitals. The decision to censor or ban artistic and scientific information can result in the loss of knowledge and potential improvements to social, political, and economic institution practices.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Durante, S. B. (2023, June 1). The Historical Significance of Titicut Follies in Psychiatric Treatment: An Anti-Censorship Perspective. Psychological Reports. SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/00332941211061080

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free