Hypotension during subarachnoid anaesthesia: Haemodynamic effects of colloid and metaraminol

52Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We have studied 45 patients, aged 60-95 yr, receiving subarachnoid block for neck of femur fractures. Patient received either colloid (polygeline, Haemaccel) 8 ml kg-1 (n = 15), metaraminol 5 μg kg-1 and 1.7 μg kg-1 min-1 (n = 15) or a combination of both treatments to maintain systolic arterial pressure (SAP) between 75 and 100% of baseline. If necessary, additional colloid 2 x 4 ml kg-1 or metaraminol 3 x 2.5 μg kg-1 was given. Arterial pressure was measured by automated oscillotonometry, central venous pressure (CVP) by a manometer and cardiac index (CI), stoke index (SI) and heart rate (HR) by transthoracic electrical bioimpedance. Systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) was derived. Colloid was less effective than metaraminol (P < 0.05). In the colloid group, SAP and SVRI decreased and CVP, CI and SI increased (P < 0.001). In the metaraminol group, initial decreases in SAP, SVRI and CVP were restored after 10-15 min and HR decreased after 12 min (P < 0.001). In the combined group, initial decreases in SAP and SVRI were restored after 4 and 16 min, and CVP, CI, SI and HR increased (P < 0.001). Metaraminol was move effective than colloid because it increased SVRI, whereas colloid increased CVP without significantly increasing CI.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Critchley, L. A. H., & Conway, F. (1996). Hypotension during subarachnoid anaesthesia: Haemodynamic effects of colloid and metaraminol. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 76(5), 734–736. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/76.5.734

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free