Experimental ischemia-reperfusion: Biases and mythsthe proximal vs. distal hypoxic tubular injury debate revisited

149Citations
Citations of this article
90Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Although the understanding of processes associated with hypoxic tubular cell injury has remarkably improved, controversies remain regarding the appropriateness of various animal models to the human syndrome of acute kidney injury (AKI). We herein compare available experimental models of hypoxic acute kidney damage, which differ both conceptually and morphologically in the distribution of tubular cell injury. Tubular segment types differ in their capacity to mount hypoxia-adaptive responses, mediated by hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs), and in cell type-specific molecules shed into the urine, which may serve as early biomarkers for renal damage. These differences may be of value in the perception of the human AKI, its detection, and prevention.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Heyman, S. N., Rosenberger, C., & Rosen, S. (2010). Experimental ischemia-reperfusion: Biases and mythsthe proximal vs. distal hypoxic tubular injury debate revisited. Kidney International. Nature Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1038/ki.2009.347

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free