Abstract
While presenting particularly interesting advantages, peptide synthesis by ball-milling was never compared to the two traditional strategies, namely peptide syntheses in solution and on solid support (solid-phase peptide synthesis, SPPS). In this study, the challenging VVIA tetrapeptide was synthesized by ball-milling, in solution, and on solid support. The three strategies were then compared in terms of yield, purity, reaction time and environmental impact. The results obtained enabled to draw some strengths and weaknesses of each strategy, and to foresee what will have to be implemented to build more efficient and sustainable peptide syntheses in the near future.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Maurin, O., Verdié, P., Subra, G., Lamaty, F., Martinez, J., & Métro, T. X. (2017). Peptide synthesis: Ball-milling, in solution, or on solid support, what is the best strategy? Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry, 13, 2087–2093. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.13.206
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.