Peptide synthesis: Ball-milling, in solution, or on solid support, what is the best strategy?

63Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

While presenting particularly interesting advantages, peptide synthesis by ball-milling was never compared to the two traditional strategies, namely peptide syntheses in solution and on solid support (solid-phase peptide synthesis, SPPS). In this study, the challenging VVIA tetrapeptide was synthesized by ball-milling, in solution, and on solid support. The three strategies were then compared in terms of yield, purity, reaction time and environmental impact. The results obtained enabled to draw some strengths and weaknesses of each strategy, and to foresee what will have to be implemented to build more efficient and sustainable peptide syntheses in the near future.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maurin, O., Verdié, P., Subra, G., Lamaty, F., Martinez, J., & Métro, T. X. (2017). Peptide synthesis: Ball-milling, in solution, or on solid support, what is the best strategy? Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry, 13, 2087–2093. https://doi.org/10.3762/bjoc.13.206

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free