Interacting forces of predation and fishing affect species’ maturation size

11Citations
Citations of this article
30Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Fishing is a strong selective force and is supposed to select for earlier maturation at smaller body size. However, the extent to which fishing-induced evolution is shaping ecosystems remains debated. This is in part because it is challenging to disentangle fishing from other selective forces (e.g., size-structured predation and cannibalism) in complex ecosystems undergoing rapid change. Changes in maturation size from fishing and predation have previously been explored with multi-species physiologically structured models but assumed separation of ecological and evolutionary timescales. To assess the eco-evolutionary impact of fishing and predation at the same timescale, we developed a stochastic physiologically size-structured food-web model, where new phenotypes are introduced randomly through time enabling dynamic simulation of species' relative maturation sizes under different types of selection pressures. Using the model, we carried out a fully factorial in silico experiment to assess how maturation size would change in the absence and presence of both fishing and predation (including cannibalism). We carried out ten replicate stochastic simulations exposed to all combinations of fishing and predation in a model community of nine interacting fish species ranging in their maximum sizes from 10 g to 100 kg. We visualized and statistically analyzed the results using linear models. The effects of fishing on maturation size depended on whether or not predation was enabled and differed substantially across species. Fishing consistently reduced the maturation sizes of two largest species whether or not predation was enabled and this decrease was seen even at low fishing intensities (F = 0.2 per year). In contrast, the maturation sizes of the three smallest species evolved to become smaller through time but this happened regardless of the levels of predation or fishing. For the four medium-size species, the effect of fishing was highly variable with more species showing significant and larger fishing effects in the presence of predation. Ultimately our results suggest that the interactive effects of predation and fishing can have marked effects on species' maturation sizes, but that, at least for the largest species, predation does not counterbalance the evolutionary effect of fishing. Our model also produced relative maturation sizes that are broadly consistent with empirical estimates for many fish species.

References Powered by Scopus

A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems

5376Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Eutrophication of freshwater and coastal marine ecosystems: A global problem

1795Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Humans as the world's greatest evolutionary force

1019Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A Conceptual Framework to Integrate Biodiversity, Ecosystem Function, and Ecosystem Service Models

28Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Assessing vulnerability of freshwater minnows in the Gangetic floodplains of India for conservation and management: Anthropogenic or climatic change risk?

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Climate change affects the distribution of diversity across marine food webs

11Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Forestier, R., Blanchard, J. L., Nash, K. L., Fulton, E. A., Johnson, C., & Audzijonyte, A. (2020). Interacting forces of predation and fishing affect species’ maturation size. Ecology and Evolution, 10(24), 14033–14051. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6995

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 8

42%

Researcher 8

42%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

11%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13

65%

Environmental Science 4

20%

Business, Management and Accounting 2

10%

Energy 1

5%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 3

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free