African Art in Deep Time: De-race-ing Aesthetics and De-racializing Visual Art

15Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In two essays in the ART/Artifact (1988) exhibition catalog, white American museum curator Susan Vogel and white American philosopher Arthur Danto pronounce that Africans do not distinguish between art and nonart. Although seemingly objective empirical statements, their assertions about Africa and its art are racially based ruminations of a white supremacist worldview. I argue that in theorizing within the category of race they produced racialized aesthetics that commit the Eurocentric fallacy of upholding systemic racist objectives. I argue that (1) their assertions fail to be about African art, but about hegemony and power; (2) as the longest enduring artistic activity of humanity, African art is an important check to racialized aesthetics; (3) art is produced outside the category of race and from a critically conscious awareness of the world; and (4) art bespeaks creativity and presupposes the artistic and moral values of a culture in the manipulation and transformation of physical reality.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nzegwu, N. (2019). African Art in Deep Time: De-race-ing Aesthetics and De-racializing Visual Art. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 77(4), 367–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/jaac.12674

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free