Assessing race and ethnicity data quality across cancer registries and EMRs in two hospitals

45Citations
Citations of this article
85Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background Measurement of patient race/ethnicity in electronic health records is mandated and important for tracking health disparities. Objective Characterize the quality of race/ethnicity data collection efforts. Methods For all cancer patients diagnosed (2007-2010) at two hospitals, we extracted demographic data from five sources: 1) a university hospi- tal cancer registry, 2) a university electronic medical record (EMR), 3) a community hospital cancer registry, 4) a community EMR, and 5) a joint clinical research registry. The patients whose data we examined (N = 17 834) contributed 41 025 entries (range: 2-5 per patient across sources), and the source comparisons generated 1-10 unique pairs per patient. We used generalized estimating equations, chi-squares tests, and kappas estimates to assess data availability and agreement. Results Compared to sex and insurance status, race/ethnicity information was significantly less likely to be available (x2 >8043, P 10 589, P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lee, S. J. C., Grobe, J. E., & Tiro, J. A. (2016). Assessing race and ethnicity data quality across cancer registries and EMRs in two hospitals. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 23(3), 627–634. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocv156

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free