Current status of optical scanning in facial prosthetics: A systematic review and meta-analysis

4Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the accuracy of scanning technologies for constructing facial prostheses on human faces. Study selection: Our systematic search was performed on five databases. Studies reporting on human volunteers (P) whose faces were scanned with a scanning technology were eligible. The anthropometrical interlandmark distances (ILDs) were used as indicators of accuracy; the ILDs are measured on the virtual models (I) and directly on the faces (C). The virtual models deviated from their true values (O). Studies reporting the measurements on patients with or without facial deformities were included, but cadavers or inanimate objects were reasons for exclusion. We performed a mean difference (MD)/standardized MD analysis with a random effect model. The difficulties regarding the scanning procedure mentioned in the articles were also assessed. Results: We found 3723 records after duplicate removal. Twenty five articles were eligible for the qualitative review, and ten articles were included in the quantitative synthesis. Eight different ILDs were compared in MD analyses. The differences were between-0.54-0.43 mm. We also performed a regional three-dimensional analysis to compare scanning technologies in each major region. No significant differences were found in any of the regions and axes. The most mentioned difficulties were artifacts due to motion or blinking. Conclusions: The results suggest no systematic skew in linear dimensions neither between direct caliper measurements nor between measurements on the scanned models, scanning technologies, or facial regions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

König, J., Kelemen, K., Czumbel, L. M., Szabó, B., Varga, G., Borbély, J., … Hermann, P. (2024). Current status of optical scanning in facial prosthetics: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Prosthodontic Research. Japan Prosthodontic Society. https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_22_00221

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free