Abstract
Objective: To compare the efficacy of photobiomodulation and occlusal splint in patients with TMD-associated myofascial pain. Material and methods: 23 patients were randomized into 2 groups: laser group (LG) (n = 12) and occlusal splint group (OSG) (n=11). For the LG, laser was applied to 3 points on each side of the face. Twelve applications were made, 2 sessions per week. In the OSG, patients were instructed to use the device during sleep, 8 hours per night, for a period of 6 weeks, and 12 adjustment and follow-up sessions were performed. Patients in both groups were reevaluated 30 days after the end of the treatments. Results: There was a decrease in pain intensity, according to a visual analogue scale, in both groups before and after 1 month (LG, p = 0.008 and OSG p = 0.002), but with no difference between groups. For the quality of life, both treatments had a positive impact, with this impact being higher in the LG compared to the OSG (p <0.05). Regarding the cost-effectiveness analysis, laser was more cost-effective than the occlusal splint in the clinical trial. The incremental cost of the laser was $3,483.45 compared to the splint, but it had a cost ratio of $4,569.02 for controlled pain intensity while the splint showed $6,691.91 ratio for controlled pain intensity. Conclusion: The photobiomodulation was more cost-effective in controlling painful symptoms in patients with TMD and myofascial pain.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Sobral, A. P. T., Sobral, S. de S., Giacon, G. G., Campos, T. M., Horliana, A. C. R. T., Fernandes, K. P. S., … Motta, L. J. (2020). Phototherapy versus Occlusal Splint to control painful symptoms in Temporomandibular Disorder: controlled, randomized cost-effectiveness clinical trial. Research, Society and Development, 9(11), e66991110251. https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v9i11.10251
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.