Prognostic significance of modified residual disease in breast and nodes (mRDBN) algorithm after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer

3Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objectives: We hypothesized that prognostic accuracy of the residual disease in breast and lymph nodes (RDBN) method, which is calculated using residual tumor size, nodal involvement, and tumor grade, may be improved by incorporating residual tumor cellularity. Methods: Cases included 614 patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer. Tumor size was adjusted for residual cellularity of invasive carcinoma and used to calculate modified RDBN (mRDBN) and compared with unmodified gross tumor size (gRDBN). Results: RDBN could be calculated in 428 cases. Relative risks of recurrence and death were significantly higher for RDBN-3 and RDBN-4 compared with RDBN-1. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed significant differences in disease-free survival and overall survival for estrogen receptor (ER)-negative/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative and ER-positive/HER2-negative subgroups (P < .0001). Conclusions: Both mRDBN and gRDBN provide prognostic information, particularly in HER2-negative carcinoma; however, mRDBN showed better stratification of RDBN-3 and RDBN-4 patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Clark, B. Z., Farrugia, D. J., Landmann, A., Diego, E. J., Dabbs, D. J., Puhalla, S. L., … Bhargava, R. (2018). Prognostic significance of modified residual disease in breast and nodes (mRDBN) algorithm after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 149(4), 332–343. https://doi.org/10.1093/AJCP/AQX168

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free