Good sport governance and design archetype: One size doesn’t ft all

10Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Milena Parent, Russell Hoye, Marijke Taks, Michael L. Naraine, and Benoît Séguin challenge the tendency to present a one-size-fits-all approach in good governance codifications, arguing that there is no one ideal type of good governance for all sport organisations. Through a case study of Canadian national sport organisations, they build the case for an empirical approach to determining key governance guidelines/indicators that builds on ideal types of sport organisations. It consists of using a cluster approach that allows deriving good governance principles from real data rather than theory. This allows for considering the scale and context of the specific sport organisations of interest.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Parent, M. M., Hoye, R., Taks, M., Naraine, M. L., & Séguin, B. (2021). Good sport governance and design archetype: One size doesn’t ft all. In Good Governance in Sport: Critical Reflections (pp. 180–194). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003172833-14

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free