Rapid ELISA D-dimer testing in the exclusion of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients

20Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The clinical diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) is known to be unreliable. Until now, no biological marker has been found to confirm thrombosis, but help can be gained from a biological marker ruling out the diagnosis of DVT or PE, i.e., the sensitive measurement of D-dimer (DD) species. This article summarizes our experience in introducing a rapid D-dimer test (ELISA VIDAS D-dimeres test, bioMerieux) in a collaborative strategy for thrombosis diagnosis during 9 consecutive months involving 1,131 measurements. The efficacy of the DD test was very different according the type of patient, and departments where the DD test provides a real diagnostic benefit were identified. High clinical probability for thrombosis was encountered in 32 patients and radiology was carried out, although D-dimer was negative: none of these patients was found to have a thrombosis after radiologic examination. However, extensive progress must be made in test prescription to reduce the excessive rate of positive D-dimer tests (78%) and positive measurements that are not followed up by radiology (42%).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Freyburger, G., Trillaud, H., Labrouche, S., Gauthier, P., Javorschi, S., & Grenier, N. (2000). Rapid ELISA D-dimer testing in the exclusion of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients. Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, 6(2), 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/107602960000600205

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free