Abstract
The clinical diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) is known to be unreliable. Until now, no biological marker has been found to confirm thrombosis, but help can be gained from a biological marker ruling out the diagnosis of DVT or PE, i.e., the sensitive measurement of D-dimer (DD) species. This article summarizes our experience in introducing a rapid D-dimer test (ELISA VIDAS D-dimeres test, bioMerieux) in a collaborative strategy for thrombosis diagnosis during 9 consecutive months involving 1,131 measurements. The efficacy of the DD test was very different according the type of patient, and departments where the DD test provides a real diagnostic benefit were identified. High clinical probability for thrombosis was encountered in 32 patients and radiology was carried out, although D-dimer was negative: none of these patients was found to have a thrombosis after radiologic examination. However, extensive progress must be made in test prescription to reduce the excessive rate of positive D-dimer tests (78%) and positive measurements that are not followed up by radiology (42%).
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Freyburger, G., Trillaud, H., Labrouche, S., Gauthier, P., Javorschi, S., & Grenier, N. (2000). Rapid ELISA D-dimer testing in the exclusion of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients. Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis, 6(2), 77–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/107602960000600205
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.