Potential technical hazards associated with four North American carbon capture and sequestration projects

5Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) risks depend upon the site geology, potential CO2-caprock reactions, anthropogenic pathways (legacy wellbores), and well construction and operation. Herein, we assess the major risks, termed 'georisks', acknowledging that quantitative description must be site-specific, although pathway impact generalisations are possible. We discuss geological and pathway issues to guide general site selection practices to reduce georisks. Events that trigger hazards and the consequences are presented for leakage, low storage capacity/injectivity, the release of hazardous gases and materials, surface uplift, and Induced seismicity. A supplementary literature-sourced hazard tabulation was developed with focus on four large-scale North American CCS projects (Quest Project, Weyburn Project, Project Pioneer and FutureGen). Each hazard is classified based on the project phase and trigger activity. The risks of CO2, brine, or other fluid leakage through wells (injection, monitoring, decommissioned legacy wells) remain uncertain, but legacy well gas leakage is common, rather than exceptional, despite modern cementing and completion practices.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sarkarfarshi, M., Ladubec, C., Gracie, R., Dusseault, M. B., Leiss, W., & Krewski, D. (2019). Potential technical hazards associated with four North American carbon capture and sequestration projects. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management, 22(3–4), 359–383. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJRAM.2019.103341

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free