Isolation and quarantine in South Africa during COVID-19: Draconian measures or proportional response?

13Citations
Citations of this article
76Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In the midst of an unprecedented public health crisis, extraordinary containment measures must be implemented. These include both isolation and quarantine, either on a voluntary basis or enforced. In the transition from voluntary to mandatory isolation, conflicts arise at the intersection of ethics, human rights and the law. The Siracusa Principles adopted by the United Nations Economic and Social Council in 1985 and enshrined in international human rights legislation and guidelines specify conditions under which civil liberties may be infringed. In order for isolation processes in South Africa to claim legitimacy, it is important that these principles as well as national laws and constitutional rights are embedded in state action.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moodley, K., Obasa, A. E., & London, L. (2020). Isolation and quarantine in South Africa during COVID-19: Draconian measures or proportional response? South African Medical Journal, 110(6). https://doi.org/10.7196/SAMJ.2020V110I6.14842

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free