The Evolving Treatment Landscape in BRAF-V600E –Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

  • Tabernero J
  • Ros J
  • Élez E
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
68Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Between 8% and 12% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) harbor a BRAF-V600E mutation in their tumors, which is associated with a poor response to standard chemotherapy and short overall survival. Moreover, nearly 30% of BRAF-V600E mCRC tumors also have microsatellite instability. Transcriptomic signatures suggest a strong immunogenic biologic background for most of these tumors. In contrast to the melanoma context, single-agent BRAF inhibition does not achieve clinical benefit in BRAF-V600E mCRC. Different preclinical/translational studies have elucidated that, in this context, upon BRAF inhibition, there is immediate signal upregulation via the EGFR, and therefore an anti-EGFR treatment should be added to the BRAF inhibitor. Several phase II studies have confirmed the activity of BRAF inhibitors combined with EGFR-directed monoclonal antibodies in patients with BRAF-V600E mCRC. The role of other mitogen-activated protein kinase inhibitors, such as mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase or PI3K inhibitors, remains unclear. The phase III BEACON clinical trial confirmed the BRAF/EGFR inhibitor combination of encorafenib/cetuximab as the new standard of care for BRAF-V600E mCRC after at least one previous line of systemic therapy. Novel approaches for managing BRAF-V600E mCRC include, among others, triple combinations of BRAF inhibitors and anti-EGFR antibodies combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors in the microsatellite instability population and evaluation of the encorafenib/cetuximab treatment in combination with standard chemotherapy with bevacizumab in the first-line setting.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tabernero, J., Ros, J., & Élez, E. (2022). The Evolving Treatment Landscape in BRAF-V600E –Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. American Society of Clinical Oncology Educational Book, (42), 254–263. https://doi.org/10.1200/edbk_349561

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free