Transnational Holocaust Memory, Digital Culture and the End of Reception Studies

  • Kansteiner W
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Holocaust memory and memory studies have always been intertwined. in the 20$\backslash$textsuperscript{\{}th{\}} century, holocaust memory advocates and memory studies scholars shared enthusiasm for politics of regret. in the 21$\backslash$textsuperscript{\{}st{\}} century, they have to share the blame for allegedly fostering euro-centrism.$\backslash$textsuperscript{\{}1{\}} all along the way, the conceptual infrastructure of memory studies developed in large measure through scholarly analyses of emerging memories of the final solution. that applies first and foremost to concepts of transnational memory which are almost synonymous with holocaust memory scholarship.$\backslash$textsuperscript{\{}2{\}} the marriage made both empirical and ethical sense. holocaust memory was one of the first fully-fledged transnational collective

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kansteiner, W. (2017). Transnational Holocaust Memory, Digital Culture and the End of Reception Studies. In The Twentieth Century in European Memory (pp. 305–343). BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004352353_014

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free